Regarding your story "Girls,
Boys and Autism" by Geoffrey Cowley and the theory that autism is a
mysterious and sometimes devastating condition that is just an extreme
version of normal male intelligence? That is one
provocative new
theory behind autism's gender gap.
I would first like to say that this article, although it gives autism
media coverage, will cause a great deal of damage
in regards to holding
the manufactures of thimerosal responsible for the damage that their
product has caused our
children's minds. The thimerosal issue
has earned its day in court. Thimerosal, which is made by
pharmaceutical
manufacturer Eli Lilly and Co., is 50 percent mercury and
may be responsible for exposing some children to mercury levels
significantly higher than Federal guidelines recommend. In the
spring of 2001 the Institute of Medicine Immunization
Safety Review Committee, concluded its analysis by suggesting that
thimerosal involvement in autism was a plausible hypothesis.
I would agree that one of the conundrums of autism is why there is an
approximate ratio of four boys to every girl
who gets this disease.
I believe that this extreme maleness that Simon Baron-Cohen speaks of
comes from
bio-chemical reactions in the body. One theory
published in Mothering
Magazine, Issue 115, November/December 2002 by Boyd Haley, Ph.D.,
Professor and Chair of the Chemistry Department, University of Kentucky,
Toxic Overload: Assessing the Role of Mercury in Autism, tested the
possibility that this could be hormone related. The results were quite
marked in their effects. Neurons that were pre-incubated with estrogen
demonstrated substantial protection against thimerosal-induced neuron
death. In contrast, the addition of testosterone caused a very large
increase in thimerosal-induced neuron death. A low nanomolar level of
thimerosal that
gave less than 5 percent neuron death in three hours could be increased to
100 percent cell death by the addition of one micromolar level of
testosterone. Testosterone alone at this level also showed less than 5
percent cell death. The opposing effects of estrogen and testosterone may
explain the gender-based four-to-one ratio. Most important, the tremendous
enhancement of thimerosal toxicity by testosterone points out the impact
of synergistic effects when addressing mercury toxicity.
Beginning in 1999, as states revealed skyrocketing rates of autism
spectrum disorder among children along with
rising unexplained Gulf War
Syndrome cases being reported by military forces, the media began to
explore the
medical controversy in print and broadcast reports. These debilitating neurological illnesses
prompted a series of
Government Reform Hearings into a wide range of
vaccine issues by Congressman Dan Burton, then Chairman of
the House
Government Reform Committee. Congressman Burton is grandfather of an
autistic child and he believes his grandson's condition was vaccine
induced. The investigations included the problems in the involuntary
military vaccine immunization program as well as the National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program (NVICP.) From the Reform Hearings a
number of key issues were identified. One of biggest issues
expressed was the possibility that the
mercury-containing compound thimerosal in vaccines may cause autism.
As to liability, the Homeland Security Bill, passed by the US House of
Representatives on 11/13/02 and in the US
Senate 11/19/02, and was signed
into law by President George W. Bush on 11/25/02 removed pharmaceutical
industry liability for mercury induced vaccine injuries and deaths caused
by
thimerosal (ethyl-mercury). A vaccine injury liability rider tacked
on to the Homeland Security Bill would have effectively ended lawsuits for
damages caused to children after multiple mercury exposures from
thimerosal in infant vaccines. (Sec. 1714-1717) The last four
sections of the bill, (sec.1714-1717) shielded the pharmaceutical
industry, specifically Eli Lilly, from lawsuits for injuries caused by
FDA-approved vaccines, such as mercury containing pediatric vaccines
associated with the development of autism.
In the first session of the new 108th Congress, Senator Stabenow (D-MI)
took the lead on repealing sections 1714-1717 of the Homeland Security
Act. Senator Stabenow's (S105) one page bill had two parts.
The first section repealed all of the vaccine related sections of the
Homeland Defense Bill
and the second states that all laws and claims should be treated as if the
law was never passed.
Eli Lilly and Co., the Indianapolis drug-maker faces at least 45 lawsuits
over its role in developing and selling for
more than 40 years a
mercury-based preservative used in childhood vaccines and now suspected of
causing autism.
Autism affects 500,000 to 1.5 million Americans and
has grown at an annual rate of 10 percent to 17 percent since
the late
1980s. That span coincides with the addition of new
government-required childhood vaccinations that
increased the levels of
mercury that children were exposed to, according to lawsuits. In
Indiana, where vaccinations are now required against up to eight diseases
before a child may start school, the number of autistic children
registered in schools has grown from 116 in 1989 to 3,789 last year.
In its apparent eagerness to promote and market the product, in September,
1930, Eli Lilly secretly sponsored a
"human toxicity" study on patients
already known to be dying of meningococcal meningitis. Senior partner
Andrew
Waters, of Waters and Kraus law firm, stated that, "Lilly then
cited this study repeatedly for decades as proof that
thimerosal was of
low toxicity and harmless to humans. They never revealed to the
scientific community or the
public the highly questionable nature of the
original research." While Eli Lilly made every effort to corrupt the
medical and scientific literature, the process of arranging to publish the
results of its questionable secret study, other researchers have provided
Lilly with numerous articles since the 1930's indicating concerns about
thimerosal and its potential hazard to humans who might be exposed or
injected with the
substance. The evidence clearly demonstrates that Eli Lilly was
advised repeatedly that their conclusions of low toxicity were not
warranted and that they failed to pass the information on to appropriate
federal and public health authorities.
In the 1940s, Eli Lilly pharmaceuticals oversaw MKUltra experiments for
the CIA using mescaline and
LSD. MKUltra was now the umbrella operation
involving mind control, behavior modification, and political
interrogations. Its methods were a blending of psychosurgery,
electroshock therapy, various powerful mind altering drugs, and hypnosis.
George H.W. Bush, after stepping aside as Director of Central Intelligence
in 1977, was made director of the Eli Lilly Pharmaceutical Company by the
father and family of current US Vice-president Dan Quayle, who owned the
controlling interest in the company. The Bush family have also been major
shareholders in other pharmaceutical companies, including Abbott, Bristol
and Pfizer (whom they are thought to still hold shares in). George H.W.
Bush was a director of Eli Lilly as well as director of the CIA at a time
when much paperwork concerning MKUltra surfaced.
It is my opinion that this should have been the cover of Newsweek as it
pertains to autism. Perhaps it will be worthy to print prior to the
November 2004 election.
Sincerely,
Diana Cregar
Clinton, Michigan
************************************************************************
Are you aware that Newsweek
has taken the article to which your theory is key, and has touted it
on the cover-on
innumerable doorsteps and newsstands across America,
as well as reaching The Today Show audience - as "Why
4 of 5
Autistic Children Are Male"? Do you realize that, while extreme
maleness may be alluded to, the synergistic effect of testosterone and
thimerosal (the mercury component in vaccines) is not even mentioned?
Do you not agree that this is a glaring and misleading omission? Have
you, too, been innocently victimized by the pharmaceutical industry so
that your theory has now been marketed presenting such an inaccurately
incomplete picture of autism to such a widespread audience, that your
words will indirectly significantly harm and kill another generation
of children? How do you feel about this? Are you empathetic or
systematic in your thinking about this? The Newsweek cover
goes on to say "What New Science Tells Us About How Our Brains Work."
Well, which "science" is this? Could you please cite the science?
Was it the science such as in the video showing what mercury does to
brain cells, imploding brain cells like the Twin Towers on 9/11? Was
it THAT science? Was it the science of how many enzymes, peptides,
and neurotransmitters are disrupted by mercury, with detrimental
domino effects to other systems? Or was it the science regarding
mercury damaging the immune system, making it prey to other viruses?
Or the damage to the gut, then leaking toxins to the developing brain?
Perhaps the "science" that would
interest America is the CDC Vaccine Safety Datalink's own science (from
"Scientific Review of Vaccine Safety Datalink
Information Concerning Thimerosal" June 7-8, 2000, Simpsonwood
Retreat
Center, Atlanta, Georgia). This said:
“we have found statistically
significant relationships between the
exposures and outcomes for these
different exposures and outcomes…for two months of age, an unspecified
developmental delay…at three months of age, tics…exposure at six
months of age, language and speech delays…
Exposure at one, three, and
six months of age, the entire category of neurodevelopmental delays,
which includes
all of these plus a number of other disorders.
And,
"...I think it's clear to me anyway
that we are talking about a problem that is probably more related to
bolus acute
exposures, and we also need to know that the migration
problems and some of the other developmental problems
in the central
nervous system go on for quite a period after birth. But from all of
the other studies of toxic substances, the earlier you work with the
central nervous system, the more likely you are to run into a
sensitive period for one of these effects, so that moving from one
month or one day of birth changes enormously the potential for
toxicity. There are just a host of neurodevelopmental data that would
suggest that we've got a serious problem. The earlier we go, the more
serious the problem...."
Dr. Baron-Cohen,
doesn't the undignified, sensationalistic, tabloid-esque presentation
of your work, which may
result in innumerable people being mislead
about the dangers of vaccines, to the detriment of innumerable
children, concern you? This is not a situation of personality
variants. Autism is a serious disorder and a serious epidemic. There
has never been a recorded genetic epidemic. The autism epidemic and
the seriously debilitating symptoms with which autistic children
struggle does not represent a gift - it represents a tragedy.
Sincerely,
Mrs. Teri Small
********************************************************************
Dear Newsweek,
Those of us who have to live in the world of autism are normally pleased to
see anything that raises awareness of
autism, even the typically poor
articles that tend to appear in the popular press. But your recent article
"Boys, Girls and Autism" is so misleading and damaging to the innocent
victims of this disorder and their families that you should print a
retraction and a sincere apology. Either your writers are seriously
misinformed, or it was your intention to portray autism inaccurately as a
something cute, geeky and lovable, something it is not. In the U.S. today
there are millions of adults taking care of hundreds of thousands of
severely disabled autistic children. Most of them are too busy coping with
the daily life of autism to be able to educate the rest of the populace
about the devastating nature of autism and the desperate need for meaningful
research, while the public, the politicians, and the popular media remain
ignorant of the reality. Whitewash stories such as your article only set
back the nearly hopeless conditions that still trap so many. Worse, you
engaged the help of numerous parents of autistic children, and they believed
you planned to write a meaningful article that might raise awareness and
shed some light - and then you published this.
You confuse mild disorders on the autism spectrum, such as Asperger's
syndrome, with actual autism, which is quite different and much more severe.
If the intent was to write about Asperger's being widespread and perhaps
something that people can live with, you should have made that clear,
without referring to it repeatedly as "autism". However, what you actually
wrote includes: "[Autism] is a mental style that people can learn to
accommodate. Sometimes it's even a gift." While someone trying to sell a
book might argue that this applies to Asperger's, it does not apply to
autism. Parents love their autistic children; they do not love the disease.
Most parents of autistic children aspire for their children to function as
well as Rain Man - he could talk, he could
understand, he could eat, he
could sleep, he didn't scream constantly, he could go to the bathroom and
didn't need
diapers. Without a lot of help or luck, many of these
aspirations are apparently in vain. Your report only lessens the likelihood
that they will get the help they need, and it lessens the likelihood of much
needed prevention and research.
You give glowing references to a theory by a psychologist in Cambridge about
a male type of intelligence
(systemizing as opposed to empathizing). Are you
claiming that autistic girls are excessively male? If so you are
sorely
mistaken, and you insult the helpless little victims of this terrible
epidemic.
The references in the article don't even mention Bernard Rimland, the Autism
Research Institute, nor any of the
organizations that are actually doing
something about the causes, prevention and cures of autism.
The annual cost of autism to the U.S. is currently estimated by the Autism
Society of America at around $100 billion dollars, with the annual cost in
10 years projected to be between $200B and $400B. This is not something we
can just learn to love.
You mix up accurate statements such as "Classic autism is a devastating
neurological disorder" and "Many
sufferers are mentally retarded and require
lifelong institutional care" with misleading and incorrect statements such
as "it has a strong genetic component", and "[it] is marked by rapid brain
growth during early childhood." The epidemic of autism is well confirmed by
numerous mainstream studies, including publications by the U.S. federal
government and the governments of various states and other countries. There
are no genetic epidemics. The genetic component of autism was advocated
originally in the 1960s by Dr. Bernard Rimland, the founder of both the
Autism Society of America and the Autism Research Institute, yet then as now
genetics was not plausible as the primary cause. You give no support to your
bold statement about "rapid brain growth" and in any case this claim, which
we know has tenuous evidence from one very small study, does not apply to
autistic people in general.
Autism - more properly, autistic disorder - is in fact an extremely
debilitating disorder. It is marked precisely by the symptoms that make up
its formal diagnostic criteria, all of which are psychological observations.
Despite the
general lack of funding for truly useful research on autism, the
studies that have been done clearly associate autism with a number of
serious medical problems - they are far too numerous to include in this
letter. Among these are:
Harvard University and Mass General Hospital's current work on medical
aspects of autism has already found that more than half of the more than 500
autistic children they have studied had treatable gastrointestinal problems
that ranged from moderate to severe including esophagitis, gastritis and
enterocolitis along with the presence of lymphoid nodular hyperplasia.
Harvard researcher Dr. Tim Buie stated in a recent report "These children
are ill, in distress and pain, and not just mentally, neurologically
dysfunctional," he said." It goes on to say "In a significant conclusion,
Dr. Buie believes that many of the symptoms of autism such as self abusive
behavior including self-mutilation, head-banging, unexplained outbursts,
atypical sleep patterns, disrupted sleep or night awakenings, are actually
symptoms of pain that a child is not able to communicate."
Multiple studies have shown that a majority of autistic children have
serious autoimmunity problems, and they have persistent measles virus in
their GI tracts and spinal fluid, while normal controls do not.
Multiple studies, including one performed by the CDC which they attempted to
keep secret, have shown a strong
association between autism and mercury (thimerosal)
in vaccines. A recently published study showed that autistic
children do not
excrete mercury nearly as well as normal controls, apparently retaining
mercury in their internal
organs. This factor is one that may indeed be
related to genetics and maleness, for reasons that have been studied
and
published but rarely mentioned in the popular press.
Imagine if Newsweek had written that heart disease has a strong genetic
component, it has nothing to do with bad
diet and environmental poisoning,
it is just a strong expression of maleness, that persons with it could
function just
fine under some circumstances, and it is just a lifestyle (deathstyle?)
that you can learn to love. How would that sit
with the millions of heart
disease sufferers and their survivors?
There are powerful vested interests who dearly want to see the autism
epidemic be forgotten. Your article is so
misleading and damaging that
millions of outraged parents and caretakers can palpably feel the insidious
hand of
the PR spin machine once again attempting to suffocate the truth.
Alexander MacInnis
Los Altos, California ********************************************************************************
Dear Sir:
"Girls, Boys and Autism" by Geoffrey Cowley is a sugar-coated, Disney
Fantasyland story about autism. The reality is that families have
to fight with the medical insurance companies, government agencies, and
education system to get proper help for their children with autism. Then
when they are older and adults like my son, Eric, the same organizations
turn their back on our adults. All these organizations require that our
children are fully vaccinated when they are babies. When our normal
children become autistic after the vaccines (developing neurological,
immunological and gastrointestinal problems), these same agencies don't
want to know about our children's problems.
Eric has temper tantrums that involves biting, head-butting, scratching,
kicking and pulling hair. In February 2003,
Eric broke my left index
finger with his teeth. He bit my wife's right index finger badly and
gave her whiplash by
butting her head. Eric has gone after his 14 year
old sister as well. Eric was suspended several times from school.
When
Eric has a tantrum we have to lock ourselves in behind our doors (two
doors he broke with his foot). We had
to call the police numerous
times. Eric is 6'1" and 195 pounds. Since February 2003 we no longer
could get respite
care. Our story is not unique, there are thousands of Erics in the US and overseas. They (medical community,
education system,
and government agencies) start by hurting the child with a vaccine and
then keep hurting him
and his family, with neglect, mismanagement and
lack of services.
Raymond Gallup, Founder
Autism Autoimmunity Project
http://autismautoimmunityproject.org
******************************************************************************
This is very upsetting. This
article is just about the biggest bunch of fodder I have ever read about
autism. This is
so misleading to America, as to be so insulting to so
many of these kids. This article mightily downplays the
excruciating
challenges that these children live with....the mountainous challenges they
must overcome in learning
tasks and language. How many of these children
are just starting with new schools and teachers, who now will
have an
inaccurate, incomplete picture of them? We all need to write - flood -
Newsweek with letters! Perhaps we should even send letters to Newsweek's
competitors.
Following are some quotes and comments:
"Though its causes are unclear, it has a strong genetic component"
Autism is an EPIDEMIC. There has never been a recorded genetic EPIDEMIC.
Ever. Even genetics professional journals, citing markers for autism,
don't cite them as the CAUSE. The EPIDEMIC needed a TRIGGER. What
is common to so many children, in so many countries, of so many varying
environments, of so many varying diets?
Look at the timing of this article. How many kids are going to be asked
to "catch up" on shots for school? And now parents will be incorrectly
reassured when they read this article, or by school staff who have read this
article, that vaccines aren't the cause of the epidemic. Could the
timing possibly be intentional?
"By Baron-Cohen’s account, autism is just an exaggerated version of the male
profile...." Yet they don't mention
the role of testosterone. They
certainly don't mention testosterone vis-a-vis thimerosal. And extreme
maleness
does not account for the gut pathology or the gut-brain relationship
and associated impaired gut function,
malabsorption, and toxins getting to the
brain.
"If Baron-Cohen is right, autism is not just a disease in need of a cure.
It’s a mental style that people can learn to
accommodate. Sometimes it’s even
a gift." He has obviously not lived the life of a severely autistic
child.
"Males aren’t hopeless, though. They show a lifelong advantage on tests of
spatial and mechanical reasoning. In
fact they’re nearly twice as likely as
women to score more than 700 on the SAT math test, and four times as likely
to
become engineers. Social conditioning may account for some of that gap."
Well, this could squash some research funding. 700 on the SAT math test
is pretty good. Unfortunately, how many thousands of autistic children
are lucky if they can give their teachers 5 objects upon request and know to
stop counting at 5? After months of trying? Ever??
"It’s not hard to see how autism fits into this scheme. In its classic form,
the condition leaves people virtually devoid of social impulses."
They've focused on social in this article. They haven't focused on the
severe learning disability and dangerous lack of self-help and speech skills.
And they haven't focused on real physiological damage, illness, pain, and
behaviors caused by the destruction of bodily systems by vaccines.
"Autistic people make generalizations, too (“it’s a train,” “it’s a blender”),
but studies suggest they work from the
bottom up, attending doggedly to
everything their senses take in. That has nothing to do with maleness, but it
helps
explain various aspects of autism—the encyclopedic memory, the
lightning-fast calculation and the extreme
sensitivity to sounds, lights and
textures. It also ties in neatly with recent studies linking autism to superfast brain
growth during the first years of life.
Researchers believe that process may generate more sensory neurons than the
brain can integrate into coherent networks." They do not address what
caused physiological destruction and
dysfunctions that cause aberrant brain
development and sensory integration disorders. They don't talk about
sensory disturbances caused by mercury or the destruction mercury causes.
They never tell us exactly how many
kids have big heads, or too many cells of
some sort, or how a vaccine-injury might have caused that. They don't
talk about enzymes, or neurotransmitters, etc. disrupted by vaccine
components.
“People with Asperger’s syndrome [a mild form of autism] are like saltwater
fish forced to live in fresh water,” a
patient once explained to Baron-Cohen.
“We’re fine if you put us into the right environment. But when the person
and
the environment don’t match, we seem disabled.”
Some advocates insist that conditions like Asperger’s
syndrome are not
disorders at all, just personality variants that have been misconstrued as
defects." This article
focuses on Asperger's. And by saying it's
not a defect, then they can exonerate drug companies.
The article (and extreme maleness) also do not account for the children's food
allergies, seizures, and REACTIONS - EVEN DEATH - THAT THEY HAVE RIGHT AFTER
OR FOLLOWING VACCINES! Little boys, previously not exhibiting symptoms
of autism, don't become severely autistic the day after an MMR shot due to
extreme maleness! Little girls don't scream for the day following
vaccines due to coincidence. None of our vaccine-injured children - be
it with asthma, allergies, ADD, ADHD, Asperger's, or mild or moderate or
severe autism - deserved the extra challenges that they got at the hands of
negligent or greedy and corrupt persons. This epidemic of immunological
and neurological debilitation, and the associated sorrow, was PREVENTABLE.
We must endeavor to PREVENT further damage. We must not ignore. We
must RESTORE.
This article sorely neglects the horrors these children face....the children's
pain, frustration, and fear....and the
behaviors that result. All of
these must be investigated, explained, and overcome by acknowledging REAL
reasons, funding REAL research - unbiased and independent - for confirmation
of etiology and development of bio-medical treatments to implement REAL
solutions. How many of our moderately-severely autistic children are
going to be able to get a job as engineers, or coding inventory with the
vaccine-induced brain damage, gut pathology, sensory issues, and resulting
pain and behaviors? These are not tens-of-thousands of kids excelling at
academic tasks and going to bed happily tucked in at night.
A Newsweek journalist has been asked for half-a-year to report on the REAL
story. Yet, THIS is what gets printed -- hat which deflects, deludes,
and destroys. Who owns Newsweek, anyway?
Mrs. Teri Small
Wilmington, Delaware
***************************************************************************
Dear Today Show,
As a mother of a five year old
"autistic" girl, I was so very disappointed to see the report based on an
upcoming
article in Newsweek concerning Autism on the Today show. I cannot
believe you would air such a theory that has
no science behind it! Are you
aware that there have been two Congressional hearings linking Mercury
toxicity and
autism? Do you know that in this past decade autism has
increased in almost every state over 500%? Are you
aware that children such
as my daughter received an excess of 125% OVER the FDA and EPA safe limits
of
mercury exposure via a preservative (fungicide) in vaccines? Did you
know that in 1990 a child received on average 11 immunizations and in 1998
the average was 23? Is this all adding up?
My daughter suffers from mercury
toxicity and I have the tests to prove this. What was aired on your show
was an
illogical theory, go back and read the transcript your self. These
children and their families deserve the dignity to at least show hard
factual evidence. I would give my life to say my child suffers from
"quirks." I would love it if she was just "quirky," but this is not the
case. We are going broke spending in excess of $75,000. a year on private
teachers, therapists, and educational conferences I must attend in order to
learn how to teach her. What about the families that do not have the means
to do this?
My daughter has never uttered
her first word, she cannot talk to ask why, but as her mother, I can! What
on Earth is mercury doing in vaccines that are injected into the blood
stream of infants beginning at the age of one day, two months, four months,
six months, twelve months, and fifteen months? What are we demanding on the
precious immune system of a child before the tender age of two?
Unfortunately my child lacks
glutathione, cysteine, and metallothione which is essential in breaking down
and excreting heavy metal toxins. This is what is wrong with her, I have the
tests to prove it and would be happy to share them with you!
What was aired, ripped out the
hearts of parents that are diligently working on behalf of their children.
These children who have no voice deserve the dignity of scientific evidence
of this devastating and debilitating disorder, not some knee jerk theory
that makes our children look like they are some psychological pet project.
This is a serious epidemic and if you really want to know why more boys are
affected than girls, may I suggest you look up Dr. Boyd Haley, Chair of the
Chemistry Dept. University of Kentucky, he has hard core (published)
evidence of this!
I challenge you on behalf of all
the families that were so insulted and hurt by such an ignorant theory that
was aired on you show, that you look into the mercury - autism link. You
will find it to be quite a political hot button in Washington DC... Who
ever breaks this story and cover up will truly be coming to the aide of the
hundreds of thousands of children and their families suffering from this
horrible nightmare!
Sincerely,
Leslie Weed
Ponte Vedra Beach, Fl
904-285-6968
*********************************************************************************
Sirs,
When will the so
called experts stop trivializing this as an interesting “condition”? They
want to spend valuable research dollars peering at it and its odd
manifestations as one would a freak exhibit at the circus.
The key to the “cause” is genetics, they say.
This is in spite of the fact that too many factors point to a serious
underlying medical condition for which there is real hope if the right
research into CAUSE could be funded.
Do you see millions in
research money going to detailed studies of how alcoholics stagger or slur
their words? Do you see millions going to study the
genetics of lung cancer to understand why some smokers are prone and not
others? Yes, there are underlying genetic factors in
alcoholism and lung cancer, too, but in those cases, it is safe to point the
finger at the real trigger. How many more thousands of
lives will have to be devastated by autism before the truth about vaccines
and the immune system can come out?
Articles such as yours
do harm by leaving the general public to think this is a purely genetic
condition. I wonder how much drug company influence was
behind this article including funding for Simon Baron Cohen’s research?
Vivian McKelvey
Driftwood Texas
***********************************************************************************
To Mr. T. Toucher, Ms. P. Powell, Mr. D. Nash, Ms. B. Alexander
& Ms K. Gerbassi
You have all contributed to an all out attack on autistic
children , adults and their families. You have single handedly put
autism back to the stone age and given people the impression that its
all in their heads, just a state of mind. You obviously are not
connected to autistics in any way shape or form, or you would not have
allowed such a disgusting misinformed piece of garbage to be told. My
son has PDD/NOS , he is 13 years old and cannot talk, and is
developmentally delayed. According to your program it is all in his
head and just a state of mind. His ongoing treatments to improve his
quality of life must than also be a figment of my imagination, as is my
ever shrinking bank account to pay for his quality of life. The Today
show owes a very public apology to all autistic kids and adults and
their families. It is the least the show could do after releasing a
piece of misinformed, uneducated, cruel tabloid journalistic hatred
towards the ever growing number of people that live with all forms of
autism 24/7. My friends and family will no longer be watching NBC in
anyway after that vicious attack on innocent people. We have also done
the same with newsweek, since they started this cruel attack and you
helped enable them to open up to a different market. You should all be
ashamed and disgusted with yourselves for attacking innocent people,
their families, their doctors and the scientists, all of whom work
tirelessly to help these beautiful children that you so openly attack. Have all of you got such low opinions of yourself that this is
how you seek pleasure and recognition. Only unthinking, uninformed, irresponsible people could sanction
this garbage.
ANGRY AND NO LONGER WATCHING
A PROUD MOTHER OF A BEAUTIFUL AUTISTIC 13 YEAR OLD
********************************************************************************
Mr. Cowley:
Please investigate elevated mercury causing the alleged "personality
variant" labeled as "autism." "Autism" is itself a misnomer... for
VACCINE-INJURY. Regressive autism is the most prevalent form today.
What would you expect to happen from injecting the second most toxic
substance
into tiny, vulnerable infants and children? Mercury is toxic in and
of itself, damaging multiple physiological systems... including the
neurological and immunological systems. Mercury is not even the only
toxin in vaccines, and synergistic effects should also be considered.
Add on top of a weakened immune system the virus-containing MMR shot and
stealth viruses, and what do you expect to get? The only "variant"
operating here, Mr. Cowley, is how much variance there is in how various
children were affected / manifested symptoms. Some got just
allergies and asthma, some
got seizures, some got ADD or ADHD, some got Asperger's, some became
severely autistic, etc. There are other manifestations of
vaccine-injury, not all of which are apparent immediately or as obviously,
such as SV-40 from contaminated polio vaccines showing up in cancer
tumors, or stealth
viruses having negative effects years later or in an even more insidious
form. Please refer to the attached mercury chart. This child
did not end up with a "personality variant." This previously
attentive and chubby child - who had been a great learner - ended up with
severe autism, mercury
toxicity, an elevated measles titer, significant gastrointestinal
problems, and an autoimmune reaction against brain tissue. Even if
your magazine were, perhaps, controlled by drug companies, your conscience
should not be.... especially when it comes to misleading the public -
parents,
educators, health practitioners, etc. - to the detriment of children.
Mr. Cowley, once you sell your conscience, it is non-refundable.
Sincerely,
Mrs. Teri Small
(302) 633-4313
*****************************************************************************
The actual experience of having
a child with autism does not sync with ideas expressed in your latest
article in Newsweek. It is bizarre to apply the "extreme maleness"
concept to a sudden loss of language, social and play skills at around 18
months of age. Are you suggesting that a child suddenly discovers
and expresses his/her maleness then? And to ignore that fact that
many children with this diagnosis have a history of severe problems with
their immune, gastrointestinal and detoxification systems, among other
biomedical issues, is an extraordinary oversight of your report. As
we have applied extensive (and expensive) medical and behavioral therapies
with our own son, he has made tremendous progress. Do these
therapies succeed because they make him "less male?" This theory
doesn't make any sense.
Marcy Kelly
|